subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Fri, Jul 10 2009 

Published: January 03, 2007 11:29 pm    print this story   comment on this story  

Expert: Windmills no threat to wells

By RANDY GRIFFITH
The Tribune-Democrat

WINDBER Water company leaders say they will not oppose wind power development above supply wells, if the developer agrees to certain rules.

“I truly believe the windmills don’t pose a significant risk to the water supply, if managed correctly,” geologist James Casselberry told Windber Area Authority Wednesday.

Casselberry reviewed residents’ concerns and protection measures during a meeting in the authority office, 1409 Somerset Ave.

“There may be other reasons not to put windmills on that ridge, but not from a water supply standpoint,” Casselberry said.

Authority members informally assigned Casselberry to work with Solicitor James Cascio and Manager Dennis Mash to draw up conditions and guidelines for development in the water authority’s well recharge area.

Gamesa Energy USA, through a subsidiary, has proposed building 38 turbines along the Allegheny Ridge area, but only a handful affect the authority’s water supply area, Casselberry explained.

Using maps and charts, Casselberry gave authority members a crash course in the hydrogeology of the mountain, showing how water and snow falling near the ridgetop finds its way through a 500-foot-thick sandstone layer to the authority’s wells in the valley.

The sandstone is covered by impregnable shale, so surface water and groundwater have no effect on the well water, he said.

Water takes more than 50 years to reach the wells from the ridge, and is filtered along the way by stone, he added.

Other development could affect the wells: Large-scale construction or mining near the ridge top, or gas wells boring through the shale layer, Casselberry said.

Plans call for each well construction to disturb just more than 1 acre, with shallow digging.

“I don’t see that as a great risk,” Casselberry said.

Activist Joseph J. Cominsky questioned Casselberry’s findings. He believes Windber’s are more closely connected to mountain surface water, citing reduced stream levels and lake levels since the wells were drilled in the early 90s.

“I have my own thoughts about the recharge area,” Cominsky said. “I do believe surface water in the streams and groundwater affects the wells.”

Berwind Natural Resources Corp. has a contract requiring the authority to approve all development on Berwind-owned land in its watershed, Cascio explained. Windmills are on Berwind property.

“Our consent can’t be unreasonably withheld,” Cascio said, adding there can be conditions set.

The committee will have an outline of requirements ready for approval at the authority meeting on Wednesday.

print this story   comment on this story  

Click to discuss this story with other readers on our forums.



Zillow
monster
autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Find a job! Find a Home! Find a car!

Premium Jobs

See all ads

Garage/Yard Sales

See all ads

Premium Homes

See all ads

Don't Miss This!

See all ads


click here click here click here click here click here click here click here click here click here click here

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index