For the third consecutive election, poll workers will ask voters to show identification, but for the third time, citizens do not need ID to vote today.
The state’s controversial voter identification law remains in limbo until an appeals court judge decides whether it’s legal. The courts have mainly focused on whether the state can make sure all registered voters are allowed to cast ballots.
With the status of the law in question, a judge has ordered that poll workers must stop telling voters they will need to have identification to vote in future elections. Suggesting identification will be required could improperly deter some voters from coming to vote, even if the law is overturned, said Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley.
An American Civil Liberties Union analysis estimated that 509,000 would-be voters would be kept from the polls by the photo ID rule. Experts hired by the state questioned some of the ACLU’s calculations. But even if all the objections raised by the state are included, the ACLU still estimates that more than 300,000 people would be disenfranchised by the rule.
Department of State spokesman Ron Ruman said the commonwealth has no alternate estimate.
Using the ACLU’s numbers, at best 1-in-18 Pennsylvanians without state-approved photo identification have obtained voter IDs created by the Department of Transportation and Department of State. The Department of Transportation has issued 13,165 IDs, while the Department of State has provided 3,937 IDs, Penn-DOT spokeswoman Jan McKnight said.
The Department of State is spending $1 million on advertising to encourage those with identification to bring it to polling places. A sample television ad on the Department of State website notes that those without identification can learn how to get suitable ID by calling
But in last summer’s voter ID trial, a Department of State official conceded that the agency has focused its efforts on getting people with identification prepared to bring it to the polls, said Vic Walczak, the ACLU’s lead attorney in the lawsuit challenging the voter ID rules.
Getting identification for those who lack it has taken a back seat, he said.
The state has made no effort to determine how many people have been showing up to vote with identification. The state also has not tracked complaints from voters who feel that they have been given improper instructions by poll workers, said Ruman.
“The law doesn’t make sense, and nothing in the state’s handling of the law has made sense,” said Walczak.
Four states have strict photo identification rules for voters – Georgia, Indiana, Kansas and Tennessee. Pennsylvania is one of seven states where new strict photo identification rules have been approved by the state legislatures, but have not gone into effect due to court challenges. The others are Arkansas, Mississippi, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin.
Proponents, chiefly Republicans, say the voter identification rules are intended to protect the integrity of the state’s election system.
House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny, notoriously predicted that the voter ID law would help Mitt Romney win in Pennsylvania.
“Voters without identification are two times as likely to be Democrats,” Walczak said.
The state has yet to demonstrate that there has been a single case of voter impersonation fraud, Walczak said.
McGinley is expected to hand down his ruling in the voter ID lawsuit before the end of the year.